London – Controversy Surrounds a Statue

The erection of the statue of the Mongolian leader, Genghis Khan, at Marble Arch, caused a great deal of controversy. To give you some idea of the kind of reaction here is a quote from labour member Councillor Paul Dimoldenberg: “To erect a statue of Genghis Khan at Marble Arch is a bizarre decision, when there are so many others who have a real connection to Westminster and the Olympics and who have improved the lives of their fellow citizens. What on earth were Westminster’s Conservative Councillors thinking when they agreed to a statue of Genghis Khan at Marble Arch? Who’s next – Stalin, Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein?”

And then I found this response from a reader:

“Sadly Genghis Khan has had bad PR in the west. Much of our modern civilisation is based on their empire. And, if you say it was bloody, look at the Romans, the Greeks and the British – Genghis Khan was responsible for creating a vast empire that promoted religious tolerance, outlawed torture, created trade between distant geographic nations and smashed aristocratic privilege. When in the 13th C we were burning Jews, they were accepting of everyone. I could go on and mention the fact that the Renaissance would not have happened without them, but I want to point out – you Labour councillors are actually arguing against your own principles and you display utter ignorance. I am ashamed to support you.”

Ah! the joys and trepidations of history. Who’s right? Who’s closer to the truth? I get the feeling that the Genghis Khan archetype is found in all civilizations no matter how civilized they’ve profess to be. We’ve all had our Genghis Khans in some way or other. So perhaps, just perhaps it’s fitting to have this statue in the midst of civilized London.













Three things to notice. He carries no arms (sword or spear) in his hands. His face is not that of a warring warrior, but of a thinking and contemplating leader of his people. And lastly, he has his armour on, therefore not denying the fact that he was a warrior leader, but the sculptor, Dashi Namdakov, has obviously toned his person down and portrayed him differently from the traditional Western perception.


About Don

I love life. Sometimes it makes sense, other times not. Discerning its underlying patterns and beauty always provides great reward and meaning and is a passion I ineptly follow. I feel deeply attached to nature and love the sea with its distinct moods and colour and find walking along its beaches wonderfully inspiring. Writing, sketching and photography is a sheer joy for me and the blog is one of the places I am able to express these pursuits.
This entry was posted in Art, Photography, Travel and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to London – Controversy Surrounds a Statue

  1. nrhatch says:

    Now I’m curious . . . will the real Genghis Kahn please stand up! 😀

    Bad PR aside ~ it does seem like a curious choice for a statute in London. Surely there are figure heads with a greater connection to Westminister?


    • Don says:

      That’s precisely the argument, Nancy. Many felt that a statue of Guy Gibson, the Dambuster commander would have been a far better option. History is so subjective that I wonder if the real figures can stand up.


  2. Whatever the arguments for or against a statue of Genghus Khan in the middle if London, which admittedly is rather strange, this is quite a magnificent work of art.


  3. Hudson Howl says:

    It is drab, dreary, windy, wet and cold here, the images and story warmed me, however am back to being jealous.


  4. ladyfi says:

    Wow – that is a spectacular statue – very eye-catching and thought-provoking, just like art should be.


  5. Don says:

    It really caught my eye, Fiona.


  6. Judy says:

    This statue is terribly interesting! Curious now about the horns of the interesting beast it is…horns that look like tree branches. Alludes to an earthly connectedness or something. I’ll need to study up..thanks for showing such an interesting image and the arguments.


    • Don says:

      Thanks Judy. It is very interesting. Some say it resembles roots which point to him as the root of the nation. Thanks for your interesting observation.


  7. History aside, the statue does no great service to the noble horse.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s